spending some time building the PPAPI plugin will give them 100% browser support for at least as long as

After all, Unity already builds two types of plugins no? ActiveX and NPAPI. not sure when they plan to completely remove NPAPI. That will at least give ~80% of the market (Chrome + IE). Unity should have bought out OnLive when it went bust.Ĭlick to expand.I believe Shiloh's point was to transfer the plugin from NPAPI -> PPAPI. I played both Batman games and BioShock through that service which I never would have done otherwise. Takes too long to compile, too long to load and too easy to decompile.Bring back OnLive streaming of games. So as you can see from these numbers I pulled out of the air, with the new WebGL, I will get 90% fewer players. Number of new players who like playing games on the internet, don't mind 90 second loading times, but refuse to use plugins : 0 Percent of people who give up after 15 second loading time: 90% Time to try out my new game with WebGL: 90 seconds. Time to try out my new game with Unity plugin all ready installed: 10 seconds. So I launch my new game targeted mostly at people who play games on the internet which corresponds closely with those who have Unity plugin installed. (Since they would have played other 3D games on the internet). Serious gamers are more likely to have all ready installed the Unity plugin. (As an example lets think of say a 3D shooter). If I have a Unity web game, it is most likely 3D which narrows the market somewhat to serious gamers.

Is it safe to enable webgl in chrome